Blog post

The ONA Advantage: A Guide to HR Metrics for Tangible Results

ONA transforms performance reviews, adapting to modern work dynamics and ensuring precise, unbiased HR assessments.

The Way We Work Has Changed

The tools and methods we employ to assess employee performance must evolve swiftly to the ever-changing dynamics of the post-COVID work environment. The traditional performance review process, a relic from the early 20th century, is increasingly being recognized as outdated and ill-suited for the modern workplace. Originally introduced by industrial psychologist Walter Scott for the U.S. military after World War I and later adopted by businesses in the 1920s, this method was designed for a time when work was largely repetitive and managers had a clear view of each employee's work.

Fast forward to the present day, where the nature of work has undergone a seismic shift. Employees now collaborate in dynamic hybrid networks, leveraging tools like Slack, Teams, and Zoom. They form cross-functional teams, often work remotely, and communicate with colleagues across continents. This transformation has significantly obscured managers' visibility into their team members' day to day work, making the traditional hierarchical approach to performance reviews misaligned with our interconnected work environment.

Challenges with Traditional Performance Reviews

Moreover, inherent biases plague the conventional review process. The performance feedback from 360° reviews, susceptible to selection bias, allows employees to cherry-pick reviewers, leading to potentially skewed feedback. Calibration sessions, intended to ensure consistency in performance ratings, often introduce more biases than they rectify. And the reliance on the grading system for performance ratings? It often misrepresents the reality, potentially undervaluing top performers and overestimating underperformers.

Here is summary of just some of the challenges that have emerged with this approach:

  1. Bias and Subjectivity in Evaluations: Research indicates that a staggering 60% of a manager's performance rating is influenced by bias, with only 20% accurately reflecting the employee's performance. This discrepancy can lead to performance feedback that doesn't genuinely represent an employee's contributions, potentially affecting their motivation and overall employee performance review experience.
  2. Inaccurate Representation of Employee Contributions: In a typical performance review with a 5-point rating scale, a vast majority (90%) of employees receive scores of 3s and 4s. This clustering in the grading system makes it challenging to differentiate between genuine top performers and the average ones, leading to potential misallocations in rewards and recognition.
  3. The Self-Promotion Dilemma: Traditional performance reviews tend to favor those good at self-promotion or managing up. This bias can overshadow the contributions of quieter team members, who might be adding significant value to the organization. As a result, these employee's accomplishments in their day to day work often go unnoticed, leading to missed opportunities for recognition and growth.
  4. The 360 Review Pitfall: While 360 reviews, a form of performance evaluation, aim to provide a more holistic view by incorporating feedback from peers and co-workers, they suffer from selection bias. Employees often cherry-pick reviewers, leading to skewed and often overly positive performance feedback. This approach can fail to provide a comprehensive and objective assessment of an employee's work performance, making it less effective in truly understanding an employee's impact and areas of improvement.

By recognizing and addressing these inherent challenges in traditional performance review methods, organizations can take a significant step towards creating a more fair, objective, and effective performance review process.

Introducing ONA: The Modern Solution

Given these challenges, there's a pressing need for a modern, data-driven approach to performance reviews—one that mirrors the interconnected nature of today's work and offers a precise assessment of an employee's performance. Enter Organizational Network Analysis (ONA), a transformative solution set to redefine how we understand and evaluate employee performance reviews.

It's essential to understand the real dynamics within your organization. Did you know that just 15% of employees create 50% of the impact in any organization? On the flip side, a mere 5% of employees are responsible for half of the problems. These statistics underscore the importance of accurately identifying top contributors and those who might need additional support.

ONA can help in this regard. By asking targeted questions like:

  • Who do you go to for help and advice?
  • Who energizes or motivates you?
  • Who do you see as an outstanding contributor?
  • Who do you believe needs additional support or attention?

ONA can paint a clearer picture of the real influencers and contributors within an organization. By asking targeted questions, it provides insights into the strong relationships and interactions within a team. This method can help identify high performers and those who might need additional training or new skills.

Scenario 1: Both the manager and the network view an employee's work performance positively. Manager's feedback: "Your performance and the positive feedback from other team members highlight your value. Your customer service skills have exceeded expectations and align with our business strategy."

Scenario 2: Both the manager and the network have concerns about an employee's work. Manager's feedback: "There have been concerns about your communication skills and problem solving abilities. Let's take the time to discuss constructive feedback and ways to improve skills."

Scenario 3: The manager views an employee's accomplishments positively, but the network has reservations. Manager's feedback: "I've noticed your dedication and organizational skills, but there's feedback suggesting you might benefit from new projects to enhance your teamwork."

Scenario 4: The manager has concerns, but the network sees the employee's work in a positive light. Manager's feedback: "Your time management needs improvement, but your peers appreciate your leadership qualities. Let's align your efforts with company standards."

The Quiet Contributors

Much has been written about employees who silently disengage from their roles, often termed "quiet quitters." However, there's another category that deserves attention: the "quiet contributors." These are individuals who might not be vocal in meetings or adept at self-promotion but play a pivotal role in driving positive outcomes. ONA is uniquely positioned to identify these individuals, ensuring their contributions are recognized and rewarded.

In this article, we'll delve deep into how enhanced performance assessment software, incorporating ONA, can significantly improve skills and employee performance. We'll explore its benefits, its stark contrast to traditional methods, and how it can be the game-changer your organization needs.

Why It Matters

Building on the scenarios we've discussed, it's clear that Organizational Network Analysis (ONA) has a broader application in enhancing workplace dynamics and performance. Let's delve deeper into the specific areas where ONA can bring transformative changes.

Here's how ONA can boost productivity and ways for HR to measure and analyze the improvements:

1. Identification of Key Players and Collaborators

Improvement: ONA helps identify employees who are central to information flow, collaboration, and decision-making. Recognizing and supporting these key players can lead to smoother project execution and faster decision-making, ensuring that company standards are met.

Measurement: Take the time to track the time taken for project completions or decision-making processes before and after the implementation of the ONA-based software.

2. Spotting and Addressing Skill Gaps

Improvement: ONA can highlight areas where teams or individuals might be lacking in skills or knowledge. Addressing these gaps through targeted training can lead to increased efficiency and work quality.

Measurement: Monitor the performance metrics of teams or individuals before and after targeted training interventions, ensuring they meet company standards.

3. Enhancing Team Dynamics

Improvement: By understanding the relational dynamics within teams, managers can make informed decisions about team compositions, ensuring that teams work cohesively and efficiently, fostering strong relationships.

Measurement: Track team-based outcomes, such as project completion rates, quality of work, and team satisfaction scores.

4. Reducing Employee Burnout

Improvement: ONA can identify employees who might be overburdened or serving as sole knowledge sources in specific areas. By redistributing workloads or providing additional training, companies can reduce burnout and maintain high productivity levels.

Measurement: Monitor employee absenteeism, turnover rates, and self-reported burnout levels, ensuring the well-being of all employees.

5. Facilitating Effective Mentorship and Knowledge Transfer

Improvement: ONA can identify potential mentors within an organization—those who are frequently sought out for advice or information. Formalizing these mentorship roles can accelerate onboarding and continuous learning, fostering strong relationships.

Measurement: Assess the time taken for new employees to reach full productivity and compare it to periods before ONA-based mentorship programs.

6. Improving Employee Engagement and Satisfaction

Improvement: When employees feel that their contributions are recognized and valued, their engagement and satisfaction levels rise, leading to increased productivity and alignment with the business strategy.

Measurement: Conduct regular employee engagement and satisfaction surveys and compare results before and after the implementation of ONA-based assessment software.

7. Optimizing Organizational Structure

Improvement: ONA can provide insights into potential bottlenecks or inefficiencies in the organizational structure. By restructuring based on ONA insights, companies can create a more streamlined and efficient workflow, ensuring organizational change is effective.

Measurement: Analyze key performance indicators (KPIs) related to operational efficiency, such as process completion times or resource utilization rates.

8. Enhancing Talent Retention

Improvement: By understanding and addressing the needs and concerns of key contributors, companies can reduce turnover, ensuring that institutional knowledge is retained and productivity remains high.

Measurement: Monitor turnover rates, especially among top performers, and compare them to periods before the use of ONA-based software.

For more detail, we've provided an index of example KPIs to monitor. By losely monitoring these, organizations can gain a clearer understanding of the impact and effectiveness of ONA in their operations. Regularly reviewing and adjusting based on these metrics ensures that the organization continues to benefit from the insights provided by ONA.

Index of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to Monitor ONA Effectiveness

1.  Identifying Key Players and Collaborators:

  • Number of Collaborative Projects: Track the number of projects where collaboration increased post-ONA implementation.
  • Speed of Decision Making: Measure the average time taken for decisions pre and post-ONA.

2. Enhancing Talent Retention:

  • Employee Retention Rate: Monitor the percentage of employees retained over a specific period.
  • Top Performer Turnover Rate: Specifically track the turnover rate among identified top performers.

3. Rehiring and Turnover Costs:

  • Rehiring Rate: Monitor the percentage of positions filled by rehires over a specific period.
  • Turnover Costs: Calculate the total costs associated with employee turnover, including recruitment, training, and lost productivity.
  • Time to Fill Vacant Positions: Measure the average time taken to fill positions post-employee departure.
  • Cost of New Hire Training: Track the average cost of training new employees compared to retraining existing ones.
  • Exit Interview Insights: Analyze feedback from exit interviews to identify common reasons for employee departures.

3. Addressing Skill Gaps:

  • Training Completion Rate: Monitor the percentage of employees who complete targeted training programs.
  • Skill Improvement Scores: Use assessments to measure the improvement in specific skills post-training.

4. Enhancing Team Dynamics:

  • Team Cohesion Score: Use surveys to measure team members' perception of team cohesion and collaboration.
  • Project Efficiency Rate: Track the percentage of projects completed on time and within budget.

5. Reducing Employee Burnout:

  • Employee Wellness Scores: Use wellness surveys to gauge employee well-being and stress levels.
  • Absenteeism Rate: Track the number of unscheduled absences pre and post-ONA.

6. Effective Mentorship and Knowledge Transfer:

  • Mentorship Participation Rate: Monitor the number of employees engaged in formal mentorship programs.
  • Knowledge Transfer Efficiency: Measure the time taken for new employees to become fully productive.

7. Improving Employee Engagement and Satisfaction:

  • Employee Net Promoter Score (eNPS): Use eNPS surveys to measure employee loyalty and satisfaction.
  • Employee Engagement Rate: Track participation in company events, initiatives, and feedback platforms.

8. Optimizing Organizational Structure:

  • Operational Efficiency Rate: Measure the percentage of processes streamlined post-ONA.
  • Bottleneck Reduction: Track the number of identified bottlenecks that have been addressed and resolved.

Conclusion: Embracing the Future of Performance Assessment

Traditional performance reviews, while foundational, no longer serve the complex, interconnected dynamics of today's work environment. Improving employee productivity and ensuring accurate performance feedback requires a fresh, data-driven approach. Organizational Network Analysis (ONA) offers precisely that, providing a holistic view of employee performance and the intricate web of relationships that drive organizational success.

By incorporating ONA into the performance review process, managers can gain deeper insights into their team members' contributions, strengths, and areas for improvement. This not only enhances the employee's work performance assessment but also fosters a culture of continuous learning and growth. Moreover, by tracking specific KPIs, organizations can measure the tangible benefits of this shift, ensuring that they are not just keeping pace with the times but setting new standards for excellence. As we move forward, it's clear that the fusion of technology, data, and human insight will shape the future of performance appraisals, and those who embrace this change will undoubtedly lead the way.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs):

What is Organizational Network Analysis (ONA) and how does it differ from traditional performance reviews?

ONA is a modern, data-driven approach to understanding and evaluating employee performance within an organization. Unlike traditional performance reviews, which often rely on hierarchical feedback, ONA provides insights into the real influencers, contributors, and relationships within an organization by analyzing the interactions and collaborations among employees.

Why is there a need to shift from traditional performance reviews to an ONA-based approach?

Traditional performance reviews, originating from the early 20th century, are often plagued with biases and may not accurately represent an employee's contributions in today's interconnected work environment. ONA offers a more holistic and objective assessment, aligning with the dynamic nature of modern workplaces.

How can ONA help in identifying "quiet contributors" within an organization?

"Quiet contributors" are individuals who may not be vocal or adept at self-promotion but play pivotal roles in driving positive outcomes. ONA, by analyzing interactions and seeking feedback from peers and co-workers, can identify these individuals, ensuring their contributions are recognized and rewarded.

What specific KPIs can organizations monitor to measure the effectiveness of implementing ONA?

Some key KPIs include the number of collaborative projects, speed of decision-making, training completion rate, team cohesion score, employee wellness scores, operational efficiency rate, and employee retention rate. Monitoring these KPIs provides insights into the impact and effectiveness of ONA in organizational operations.

How can ONA enhance talent retention and employee engagement?

ONA provides insights into the needs and concerns of key contributors within an organization. By understanding and addressing these needs, companies can reduce turnover and ensure that valuable institutional knowledge is retained. Additionally, when employees feel their contributions are recognized and valued, their engagement and satisfaction levels rise, leading to increased productivity.

Ready to see Confirm in Action?

See why forward-thinking enterprises use Confirm to make fairer, faster talent decisions and build high-performing teams.