How Confirm compares to every performance management platform
Most performance tools rely on surveys, check-ins, and manager opinions. Confirm uses Organizational Network Analysis to reveal who actually drives results. See how we compare.
The Confirm difference
Every platform below captures what people say about performance. Confirm captures what people do.
Organizational Network Analysis
We analyze collaboration patterns to reveal who people actually turn to for help, expertise, and collaboration, no surveys needed.
Hidden Performer Detection
Find the quiet contributors who make teams successful but don't self-promote. Traditional reviews miss them; ONA reveals them.
Passive Data Collection
Zero employee effort required. We integrate with tools you already use, Slack, email, calendar, and surface insights automatically.
Why Teams Choose Confirm
"We launched on a Monday, and by Saturday morning we had 98% of performance reviews done. I don't know that I've ever seen that level of completion in that amount of time."
"We reviewed Lattice, Rippling, and Culture Amp. Confirm was the only platform designed to be light-weight, fast, and easy to use."
"You don't realize how much you miss until you have a tool like Confirm."
"With Confirm, reviews were super quick, accurate and easy to edit. Probably saved me 80% of my time typically used in writing reviews."
"Confirm is the first tool that lets me see the behavioral side with holistic evidence. I can quickly get the information to make decisions."
"For the first time in my 10+ years in People/HR, 100% of team members completed their self evaluations."
"Confirm has transformed the way we do performance reviews, and helped us become a more data-driven HR organization."
"Confirm is a VITAL part of how we operate as a company. It helps us keep our team more engaged than they already were."
Compare Confirm to leading platforms
Click any comparison to see the full breakdown, features, pricing, use cases, and honest assessments of where each platform excels.
Confirm vs Lattice
See how ONA-powered insights compare to traditional performance reviews and goal tracking.
Confirm vs 15Five
Brief ONA surveys vs. weekly check-ins and continuous self-reported updates.
Confirm vs Culture Amp
Performance intelligence from behavioral data vs. employee sentiment surveys.
Confirm vs BambooHR
Specialized performance intelligence that layers on top of core HRIS.
Confirm vs Workday
Enterprise-grade performance intelligence without the implementation complexity.
Confirm vs SAP SuccessFactors
Modern performance management that layers on top of your SAP ecosystem.
Confirm vs HiBob
Specialized performance depth vs. all-in-one HR breadth.
Confirm vs BetterWorks
Move beyond goal tracking to understand who actually drives results.
Confirm vs Leapsome
Data-driven insights that go deeper than engagement surveys.
Confirm vs Reflektive
A modern alternative for teams seeking stability post-acquisition.
Confirm vs Small Improvements
Complement your feedback tools with the data feedback can't capture.
Confirm vs Windmill
Strategic ONA insights vs. tactical task-based review writing automation.
Quick comparison
How Confirm's approach differs from traditional performance management
| Capability | Traditional Tools | Confirm |
|---|---|---|
| Data source | Surveys, check-ins, manager ratings | Behavioral collaboration data (ONA) |
| Employee effort | Regular participation required | Brief survey at review cycle start |
| Hidden performers | Missed (relies on visibility) | Identified automatically |
| Bias resistance | Subject to recency, halo effects | Data-driven calibration |
| Implementation | 2-6+ months typical | 5 weeks |
| Retention signals | Exit surveys (too late) | Network changes (early warning) |
See Confirm in action
Discover what traditional performance tools are missing about your team.